factor/library/test/sbuf.factor

IN: temporary
USING: kernel namespaces sequences strings test ;

[ "Hello" ] [
    100 <sbuf> "buf" set
    "Hello" "buf" get nappend
    "buf" get sbuf-clone "buf-clone" set
    "World" "buf-clone" get nappend
    "buf" get sbuf>string
] unit-test

[ CHAR: h ] [ 0 SBUF" hello world" nth ] unit-test
[ CHAR: H ] [
    CHAR: H 0 SBUF" hello world" [ set-nth ] keep 0 swap nth
] unit-test
messing around with ffi, various other fixes 2005-03-28 23:45:13 -05:00			`IN: temporary`
sbuf-nth fix, other misc changes 2005-04-07 18:54:02 -04:00			`USING: kernel namespaces sequences strings test ;`
str/vector-hashcode 2004-09-26 21:34:25 -04:00
various cleanups, better memory signal handler 2004-10-17 19:01:16 -04:00			`[ "Hello" ] [`
			`100 <sbuf> "buf" set`
minor cleanups here and there 2005-04-19 20:28:01 -04:00			`"Hello" "buf" get nappend`
various cleanups, better memory signal handler 2004-10-17 19:01:16 -04:00			`"buf" get sbuf-clone "buf-clone" set`
minor cleanups here and there 2005-04-19 20:28:01 -04:00			`"World" "buf-clone" get nappend`
hashtables were sized wrong; rename str- words to string- 2005-03-05 16:33:40 -05:00			`"buf" get sbuf>string`
various cleanups, better memory signal handler 2004-10-17 19:01:16 -04:00			`] unit-test`
sequence protocol 2005-04-02 02:39:33 -05:00
all tests now pass; more unix ffi i/o work 2005-04-03 19:02:50 -04:00			`[ CHAR: h ] [ 0 SBUF" hello world" nth ] unit-test`
sbuf-nth fix, other misc changes 2005-04-07 18:54:02 -04:00			`[ CHAR: H ] [`
			`CHAR: H 0 SBUF" hello world" [ set-nth ] keep 0 swap nth`
			`] unit-test`