steve
/
factor
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

stack-checker: fix doc typo reported by OneEyed

db4
Slava Pestov 2009-06-21 15:11:41 -05:00
parent 330bea3cc2
commit 0068a3d965
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
basis/stack-checker/stack-checker-docs.factor
View File

@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ $nl
"Combinators which are recursive require additional care. In addition to being declared " { $link POSTPONE: inline } ", they must be declared " { $link POSTPONE: recursive } ". There are three restrictions that only apply to combinators with this declaration:"
{ $heading "Input quotation declaration" }
"Input parameters which are quotations must be annotated as much in the stack effect. For example, the following will not infer:"
{ $example ": bad ( quot -- ) [ call ] keep foo ; inline recursive" "[ [ ] bad ] infer." "Got a computed value where a literal quotation was expected\n\nType :help for debugging help." }
{ $example ": bad ( quot -- ) [ call ] keep bad ; inline recursive" "[ [ ] bad ] infer." "Got a computed value where a literal quotation was expected\n\nType :help for debugging help." }
"The following is correct:"
{ $example ": good ( quot: ( -- ) -- ) [ call ] keep good ; inline recursive" "[ [ ] good ] infer." "( -- )" }
"The effect of the nested quotation itself is only present for documentation purposes; the mere presence of a nested effect is sufficient to mark that value as a quotation parameter."