From 0b60d6cc4ce8e5d4f3c9abb6591f98920cbec8f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Benediktsson <mrjbq7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:06:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] bloom-filters: fix docs.

---
 extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-docs.factor  | 4 ++--
 extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor | 2 +-
 extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters.factor       | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-docs.factor b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-docs.factor
index 9df586f468..9718738ba5 100644
--- a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-docs.factor
+++ b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-docs.factor
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ IN: bloom-filters
 
 HELP: <bloom-filter>
 { $values { "error-rate" "The desired false positive rate.  A " { $link float } " between 0 and 1." }
-          { "number-objects" "The expected number of object in the set.  A positive " { $link integer } "." }
+          { "capacity" "The expected number of object in the set.  A positive " { $link integer } "." }
           { "bloom-filter" bloom-filter } }
 { $description "Creates an empty Bloom filter." }
-{ $errors "Throws a " { $link capacity-error } " when unable to produce a filter meeting the given constraints.  Throws a " { $link invalid-error-rate } " or a " { $link invalid-n-objects } " when input is invalid." } ;
+{ $errors "Throws a " { $link invalid-size } " when unable to produce a filter meeting the given constraints.  Throws a " { $link invalid-error-rate } " or a " { $link invalid-capacity } " when input is invalid." } ;
 
 
 HELP: bloom-filter-insert
diff --git a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor
index 06a84e3dd3..9c933230e8 100644
--- a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor
+++ b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ IN: bloom-filters.tests
 [ 4 32 ] [ 0.05 5 size-bloom-filter ] unit-test
 
 ! This is a lot of bits.
-[ 0.00000001 max-array-capacity size-bloom-filter ] [ capacity-error? ]  must-fail-with
+[ 0.00000001 max-array-capacity size-bloom-filter ] [ invalid-size? ]  must-fail-with
 
 ! Other error conditions.
 [ 1.0 2000 <bloom-filter> ] [ invalid-error-rate? ] must-fail-with
diff --git a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters.factor b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters.factor
index 04d5ec1d37..e5e14d48fb 100644
--- a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters.factor
+++ b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters.factor
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ TUPLE: bloom-filter
 { capacity fixnum read-only }
 { count fixnum } ;
 
-ERROR: capacity-error ;
+ERROR: invalid-size ;
 ERROR: invalid-error-rate error-rate ;
 ERROR: invalid-capacity capacity ;
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ERROR: invalid-capacity capacity ;
 ! If the number of hashes isn't positive, we haven't found
 ! anything smaller than the identity configuration.
 : check-hashes ( 2seq -- 2seq )
-    dup first 0 <= [ capacity-error ] when ;
+    dup first 0 <= [ invalid-size ] when ;
 
 ! The consensus on the tradeoff between increasing the number of
 ! bits and increasing the number of hash functions seems to be