From bf81b19ed7810e7a9db36cb693d661b2c3b8a662 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alec Berryman Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:50:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] bloom-filters: fix tests on 64-bit machines Lose the test that might actually create a very large bit-array and use a number of elements that will be big enough, whatever the platform. Now tested on a 64-bit machine. --- extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor index 6dce1c2ca9..9b5bf48912 100644 --- a/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor +++ b/extra/bloom-filters/bloom-filters-tests.factor @@ -24,10 +24,7 @@ IN: bloom-filters.tests [ 4 32 ] [ 0.05 5 size-bloom-filter ] unit-test ! This is a lot of bits. -: oversized-filter-params ( -- error-rate n-objects ) - 0.00000001 400000000000000 ; -! [ oversized-filter-params size-bloom-filter ] [ capacity-error? ] must-fail-with -! [ oversized-filter-params ] [ capacity-error? ] must-fail-with +[ 0.00000001 max-array-capacity size-bloom-filter ] [ capacity-error? ] must-fail-with ! Other error conditions. [ 1.0 2000 ] [ invalid-error-rate? ] must-fail-with