From c8cfaee9afb933da7275f41885c601e1f559cbb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Benediktsson <mrjbq7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:29:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] stack-checker: make this an unchecked-example.

---
 basis/stack-checker/stack-checker-docs.factor | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/basis/stack-checker/stack-checker-docs.factor b/basis/stack-checker/stack-checker-docs.factor
index 3158cfd9a5..03e8a38f93 100644
--- a/basis/stack-checker/stack-checker-docs.factor
+++ b/basis/stack-checker/stack-checker-docs.factor
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ $nl
 "However a small change can be made:"
 { $example ": good ( ? quot: ( ? -- ) -- ) [ good ] 2keep [ not ] dip call ; inline recursive" "[ [ drop ] good ] infer." "( x -- )" }
 "An inline recursive word must have a fixed stack effect in its base case. The following will not infer:"
-{ $example
+{ $unchecked-example
     ": foo ( quot ? -- ) [ f foo ] [ call ] if ; inline"
     "[ [ 5 ] t foo ] infer."
     "The inline recursive word “foo” must be declared recursive\nword foo"