This website requires JavaScript.
Explore
Help
Sign In
steve
/
factor
Watch
1
Star
0
Fork
You've already forked factor
0
Code
Issues
Pull Requests
Releases
Wiki
Activity
21d29b3961
factor
/
basis
/
cpu
History
Slava Pestov
2d5cdd19ec
compiler: on PPC, ANDI, ORI and XORI instructions take an unsigned 16-bit immediate, unlike ADDI, SUBI and MULLI which take a signed 16-bit immediate. The code generator was not aware of this, and so for example '[ >fixnum -16 bitand ]' would generate incorrect code. Split up small-enough? hook into immediate-arithmetic? and immediate-bitwise? and update value numbering to be aware of this. Fixes classes.struct bitfields test failure
2009-10-19 04:58:29 -05:00
..
architecture
compiler: on PPC, ANDI, ORI and XORI instructions take an unsigned 16-bit immediate, unlike ADDI, SUBI and MULLI which take a signed 16-bit immediate. The code generator was not aware of this, and so for example '[ >fixnum -16 bitand ]' would generate incorrect code. Split up small-enough? hook into immediate-arithmetic? and immediate-bitwise? and update value numbering to be aware of this. Fixes classes.struct bitfields test failure
2009-10-19 04:58:29 -05:00
arm
/assembler
cpu.arm.assembler: dust it off, update to work with contemporary Factor, and clean it up a bit
2009-10-02 20:18:34 -05:00
ppc
compiler: on PPC, ANDI, ORI and XORI instructions take an unsigned 16-bit immediate, unlike ADDI, SUBI and MULLI which take a signed 16-bit immediate. The code generator was not aware of this, and so for example '[ >fixnum -16 bitand ]' would generate incorrect code. Split up small-enough? hook into immediate-arithmetic? and immediate-bitwise? and update value numbering to be aware of this. Fixes classes.struct bitfields test failure
2009-10-19 04:58:29 -05:00
x86
compiler: on PPC, ANDI, ORI and XORI instructions take an unsigned 16-bit immediate, unlike ADDI, SUBI and MULLI which take a signed 16-bit immediate. The code generator was not aware of this, and so for example '[ >fixnum -16 bitand ]' would generate incorrect code. Split up small-enough? hook into immediate-arithmetic? and immediate-bitwise? and update value numbering to be aware of this. Fixes classes.struct bitfields test failure
2009-10-19 04:58:29 -05:00
summary.txt
…
tags.txt
…